Journal of American Indian EducationVolume 9 Number 1
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
School and Class |
N. |
Gram. |
Voc. |
Read. |
Raw. |
Eq. |
AC |
Comp. |
Total |
|
32.08 |
25.14 |
7.32 |
64.54 |
72.41 |
84.95 |
83.16 |
80.08 |
||
|
Mission 9 |
37 |
(6.42) |
(7.49) |
(3.02) |
(14.30) |
(15.59) |
(9.93) |
(9.05) |
(9.00) |
|
32.24 |
26.83 |
7.60 |
66.66 |
74.17 |
85.20 |
85.14 |
81.57 |
||
|
St. Francis 9 |
35 |
(5.55) |
(7.05) |
(2.90) |
(13.65) |
(12.20) |
(10.37) |
(6.75) |
(8.96) |
|
32.28 |
26.40 |
7.90 |
66.58 |
74.18 |
85.08 |
80.58 |
79.92 |
||
|
Pine Ridge 9 |
50 |
(4.69) |
(6.72) |
(2.73) |
(12.13) |
(10.70) |
(8.52) |
(8.03) |
(7.78) |
|
33.67 |
29.89 |
9.00 |
72.56 |
79.00 |
86.94 |
84.33 |
83.44 |
||
|
Mission 12 |
18 |
(4.87) |
(8.60) |
(2.40) |
(15.01) |
(13.00) |
(8.90) |
(8.40) |
(9.21) |
|
34.96 |
32.42 |
9.62 |
77.38 |
83.23 |
89.38 |
84.88 |
85.81 |
||
|
St. Francis 12 |
26 |
(5.46) |
(5.78) |
(3.79) |
(13.58) |
(11.38) |
(9.53) |
(7.50) |
(8.58) |
|
35.96 |
33.16 |
9.56 |
78.68 |
84.40 |
90.32 |
86.64 |
87.08 |
||
|
Pine Ridge 12 |
25 |
(2.27) |
(5.18) |
(2.97) |
(8.99) |
(7.28) |
(6.27) |
(4.39) |
(4.64) |

Table 3 is a breakdown by percentile comparing Indian student results on each subtest with results of foreign students representing various language groups.
|
Subtest |
Group |
Mean Score |
Percentile (of 500 foreign students) |
|
Grammar |
St. Francis 12 Mission 12 Pine Ridge 12 |
34.96 33.67 35.96 |
62 52 70 |
|
Vocabulary |
St. Francis 12 Mission 12 Pine Ridge 12 |
32.42 29.89 33.16 |
56 41 59 |
|
Reading |
St. Francis 12 Mission 12 Pine Ridge 12 |
9.62 9.00 9.56 |
25 20 24 |
Table 4 breaks down Pine Ridge scores on the entire
Michigan Test Battery on the basis of mother tongue. The difference in test scores between the two groups appears to be significant, although not as great as one would expect. Both ninth and twelfth graders, for whom English is the mother tongue, scored about four points higher than their Lakota speaking counterparts, which lends credence to figures otherwise suspect because of the small number of students tested and the questionable accuracy of student statements as to their first language.|
Lakota (Indian) |
English |
||||||
|
No. |
Pct. |
Avg. |
No. |
Pct. |
Avg. |
||
|
Grade 9 |
21 |
.42 |
77.19 |
28 |
.56 |
81.96 |
|
|
Grade 12 |
12 |
.48 |
85.00 |
13 |
.52 |
89.00 |
|
Note. One native speaker of Spanish not included.
Table 5 presents a breakdown of mean scores on the entire battery in terms of degree, of Indian blood. No definite pattern appears other than, that those of less than one-fourth Sioux extraction do slightly better than those with a higher percentage of Indian blood. One would expect a significant pattern of differences in text scores on the basis of greater isolation of full-bloods, fewer native speakers of English among them, and closer involvement with their Sioux cultural heritage and much less involvement in, the surrounding non-Indian culture. For this not a good predictor of group, degree of Indian blood is apparently in English language proficiency.
|
Full |
3/4 |
1/2 |
|||||||||
|
No. |
Pct. |
Avg. |
No. |
Pct. |
Avg. |
No. |
Pct. |
Avt. |
|||
|
Grade 9 |
9 |
.18 |
73.9 |
16 |
.32 |
81.2 |
7 |
.14 |
78.8 |
||
|
Grade 12 |
5 |
.20 |
87.8 |
7 |
.28 |
86.7 |
7 |
.28 |
84.8 |
||
|
1/4 |
Less |
||||||
|
No. |
Pct. |
Avg. |
No. |
Pct. |
Avg. |
||
|
Grade 9 |
9 |
.18 |
82.4 |
9 |
.18 |
82.1 |
|
|
Grade 12 |
4 |
.16 |
88.2 |
2 |
.08 |
91.5 |
|
Table 6 shows mean scores on each subtest of the MTB by grade and mother tongue. The table indicates that the areas in which native speakers of Lakota are most handicapped are vocabulary and aural comprehension. Note the Lakota speakers scored better than the native speakers of English on the composition section of the test. The reason for this is unknown, but one might guess that the Lakota-speaking students are more conscientious and therefore made a greater effort and used more of the time allowed for writing on the composition than did the other group. At least one examiner observed this to be the case.
|
Grade 9 |
Grade 12 |
|||
|
Indian |
English |
Indian |
English |
|
|
Vocabulary |
24.2 |
28.2 |
31.5 |
34.7 |
|
Grammar |
30.7 |
33.4 |
35.8 |
35.5 |
|
Reading |
7.9 |
7.9 |
9.2 |
9.8 |
|
Aural Comprehension |
80.8 |
87.8 |
87.1 |
93.2 |
|
Composition |
80.1 |
77.6 |
85.2 |
81.8 |
Note. One native speaker of Spanish is not included.
Conclusions
1. In general the competence level of twelfth grade students tested in basic phonological and grammatical structure is more limited than that of the native speaker but more extensive than that of the foreign students for whom the test was designed. This is true despite the fact that 50 percent of the students tested indicated English as their native language.
John A. Upshur, Director of Testing and Certification at the English Language Institute, comments: "The ability (of the Indian students tested) to use this somewhat limited knowledge for communication is relatively high in comparison with foreign applicants as indicated by high aural comprehension and composition scores. Lower scores in vocabulary and reading seem to indicate a narrow range of experience in the use of English."
2. Reading comprehension is the area of greatest weakness of all students tested. Compared with foreign students, the twelfth graders tested would be at about the 23rd percentile; ninth graders would be below the 10th percentile.
3. Vocabulary acquisition is a significant problem for most of the students tested, especially for those who learned Lakota as a first language.
4. Those students who claim English as a first language scored somewhat higher than those whose first language is Lakota.
5. All students scored rather high on aural comprehension and composition sections in comparison with foreign students, but not as high as would be expected of native speakers of English.
6. For those whose first language is Lakota, vocabulary and aural comprehension are the most significant areas of difficulty and the areas which most significantly differentiate their proficiency in English from that of native speakers.
7. Differences in degree of Indian blood are not, at least for the group tested, significant indicators of English proficiency, although those who have the largest percentage of Indian blood are least likely to acquire English as a first language.
8. Unfortunately, attendance at an integrated school with a significant non-Indian population is apparently not a solution to lack of English proficiency on the part of Indian students. The twelfth graders at Mission (Todd County) scored lower, in fact, than either of the other groups tested. Why this is so is not immediately obvious. Examiners noted, however, that in integrated classes Indian students are reluctant to compete with their white classmates. They tend to sit in the back of the room and function as observers rather than participants, despite the teacher’s efforts to involve them. As a result the teachers seem naturally to direct their teaching to those who respond--the non-Indian students in the front of the class. Although Indian students are seldom competitive, this situation cannot occur in the mission schools, in which all are considered Indian and there is no apparent "out" group.
9. Techniques characteristic of the teaching of English as a second language seem to be indicated by the test results. It is probably in the lower grades, however, that such instruction is most needed, especially in the areas of vocabulary acquisition and aural comprehension. Reading comprehension is also an area needing special attention in the lower grades.
10. The most obvious implication of test results is for teachers to be aware that in some areas of English proficiency their Sioux students are more like non-native speakers of English than like native speakers.
It should be pointed out in conclusion that language problems among Indian students are often only surface reflections of underlying sociological and psychological problems; that English instruction is only one of many variables affecting English proficiency; and that proficiency in English as one of many factors related to success in school. Environmental factors are also significant to the test results. It is quite possible that non-Indian students from rural South Dakota would show the same lag in proficiency demonstrated by Indian students.
Notes
1. The Michigan Test of English Language Proficiency, Form C (1962) and Test of Aural Comprehension, Form A, English Language Institute, University of Michigan.